Lieberman Show

Kay's Commentary

podcasts

Kay's Commentary Podcasts on Demand

Miss Kay's Commentary on the air? We've uploaded them all here in our podcast library.

All podcasts are designed to play from our website with no software required.
For more advanced options,
open our feed in iTunes or subscribe to our Podcast Feed.

Kay commentary 2013-03-16

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here

The following is a KSCO commentary.  Here is Kay Zwerling:

In the early 1930s when Hitler became leader of Germany, his first Law was to take the guns away from the people, so the Jews went quietly to the ovens, six million of them, including my maternal uncle and his family.  I was a child at that time. 

I am a vigorous opponent of gun control because it is naïve and stupid to believe that taking guns away from citizens will eliminate or lessen crimes – that is nuts!

Listen to the following news from Australia, which underscores the folly of taking guns away from the people.  This is dated 3-5-2006, and it is from Ed Chenel, a Police officer in Australia:  

“Hi Yanks, I thought you would like to see the real figures from Down Under.  It has now been 6 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australian taxpayers more than $500 million.  

The first year’s results are in now:  

Australia-wide, homicides are up 8.2%.   Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6%.  Armed robberies are up 44% – yes, 44% in the State of Victoria alone.  Homicides with firearms are now up 300%, and that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns.  

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months since the criminals now are guaranteed that their victims are unarmed.  There have also been dramatic increases in break-ins and assaults of the elderly while the resident is in the home.

Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety was decreased after such monumental efforts, and expenses are expended in successfully ridding Australia of guns.  You will not see this in the American evening news, or hear your Governor or members of the State Assembly disseminating this information, because they have an idiotic mental block.

The Australian experience speaks for itself.  Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property, and gun control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.  It is a no brainer!  Take note Americans before it is too late.  Remember guns do not kill people – people kill people.  Put another way, when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns!   
        Please forward this information to everyone you know.  Do not be a member of the silent majority.  Be one of the vocal minority who will not let this happen in the USA.”

For KSCO, this is Kay Zwerling.

© copyright 2013

Transcription compliments and courtesy of:  http://xcription.home.comcast.net  or  http://home.comcast.net/~xcription     I ♥ Referrals!

Kay Commentsry 2013-03-09

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here

The following is a KSCO commentary.  Here is Kay Zwerling:

          I wrote this story about my mother in 1981, two years after her death.  I was studying clinical philosophy at that time, a new discipline, which was deep, personal, and analytical, and while I was still missing my mom, I thought about her a great deal then.

Parents and children have powerful and intimate relationships and perspectives about each other – sometimes positive, sometimes negative, and sometimes neutral.  Here I reveal my mother through my own appreciation of being a child, a parent, and a grandparent.   I address a philosophical problem, that of finding a sense of groundedness in response to the universal human problem of the abyss – that is, the lack of meaning and aloneness – or nothingness.  My mother found her ground in God, and in so many ways, now I do, too.  

This is called “My Mother’s Ground”.

 She came to America from Greece in 1912, or thereabouts, at the age of 16.  The fourth in a family of six children, quite poor, she had been a young schoolteacher in her village.  Her sister and brother-in-law living in New York sent her the money to join them in the land of hope and opportunity.

She met and married my father, had three children, became a widow at 42.  With the three of us married, or gone soon after, she remained alone in the big house, and somehow managed to make the money last.

We worried and wondered at her aloneness every night.  She would say to me “God will take care of me, I’m not afraid.”  God was my mother’s ground.  

An invalid for six years, and in need of continual custodial care, my 82-year-old mother spent her final years in a local convalescent home.  At times, she was amazingly alert – other times, forgetful.  Most often, strangely peaceful and content.  In the early days of her confinement, she would often ask in bewilderment “Por que el Dios mi hizo esto ” (Why did God do this to me?)

Interestingly, after her second stroke, she communicated almost exclusively in Spanish, her native tongue, despite the fact that she had been quite articulate in English.

What made it possible for my mother to face each day with valor, even a smile?  Her philosophy, which she affirmed each day when we were together, and that was every day, “Todo lo que hace Dios es para bien” (Everything that God does is for good).  God was my mother’s ground.

In a way, I envied her very much, but I do not believe she ever allowed herself to see the abyss.  She chose very early in her life to insulate herself from the anxiety of nihilism by a total and daily commitment to the will of God.

What a fascinating and incongruous polarity of personality was my mother:   A most gentle benign imposition of an iron will in areas concerning her children, and a personal complete and total surrender to the will of God.  Indeed, God was my mother’s ground.

For KSCO, this is Kay Zwerling.

© copyright 2013

Transcription compliments and courtesy of:  http://xcription.home.comcast.net  or  http://home.comcast.net/~xcription     I ♥ Referrals!

Kay Commentary 2013-02-16

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here

The following is a KSCO commentary.  Here is Kay Zwerling:

          My friend Zoltan sent this to me, and it is really worth repeating.  Let’s call it “It is the new American way”.  I ask all Obama supporters to please share this with others who voted for him.  Perhaps you will then understand the problem with the fair share he supports, because you will not read it in any newspaper and certainly not on any TV station.   We felt like this was the perfect time to share this important story with you. 

          Recently our good friend, a local realtor, shares his experience with us about an Obama supporter he encountered while selling homes to a low income working family in Pontiac, Michigan.  We asked him to please write it down so we could share it with you.  You should be sitting down while reading this. 

          As a realtor for the past 28 years, I thought I had seen or heard it all, until now. 

          I was showing homes in Pontiac one afternoon recently and showed up at a home at 4:00 p.m.  The homeowner proceeded to tell my buyers and I she had already entered into a contract to sell the home on a short sale, where the bank accepts less money than is owed on the home.   

          She proceeded to tell us she and her sister, who also lived in the area, were buying each other’s home via the short sale process.

          I mentioned to her that I thought relatives could not be involved in those transactions.  She smiled and said “We have two different last names so no one knows the difference.”

          She went on to tell us each of them owed over $100,000 on their homes and were in the process of buying each other’s homes for about $10,000-$15,000 cash.  To top it off, they were each receiving $3,000 in government provided relocation assistance at the closing.

          My buyers and I were amazed that she was outright admitting to fraud and yet she continued.

          She began to tell us that the best part of her scheme was that because they currently were not working they both are now receiving Section 8 vouchers.  I said I thought those were for renters.  She said “That is the best part.  Me and my sister are going to be renting each other’s homes so we do not have to move, and Obama is going to give us each $800 a month to pay the rent.”

          So here is the bottom line – both of these scammers got at least $80,000 in debt forgiven, $3,000 in cash for relocation when in fact they did not relocate, and to boot you and I will now be paying through our taxes $1,600 in rent for each of them each and every month, perhaps forever.” 

          Is it any wonder why so many people have decided that all they have to do is vote for the Democrats and they will be taken care of for life at the expense of the taxpayers?!   I would not be at all surprised if they are receiving food stamps and whatever other programs are available for anyone who is willing to LIE to get assistance. 

          These women went from working and paying about $900 each in mortgage payments to staying home and getting paid $800 each per month to live in the same homes they had been living in – and all they had to do is LIE on a few papers.  This craziness has to stop!   I am sure this kind of FRAUD is going on each and every day all across the Country, and no one wants to touch the subject of entitlements.  

          It is the new American way.

          For all of the do-gooders who voted for Obama to help the less fortunate – cheers – they are now the “most” fortunate. 

For KSCO, this is Kay Zwerling.

© copyright 2013

Transcription compliments & courtesy of:  http://xcription.home.comcast.net  or  http://home.comcast.net/~xcription     I ♥ Referrals!

 

Kay Commentary 2013-03-02

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here

The following is a KSCO commentary.  Here is Kay Zwerling:

My friend Michael Olson shared this with me.  It is called “Catching Pigs”, and it is thought provoking. 

There is a chemistry professor in a large college that had some exchange students in the class.  

One day while the class was in the lab the Professor noticed a young man (an exchange student) who kept rubbing his back.  The professor asked the young man what was the matter, and the student told him that he had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country's government and install a new communist regime.

In the midst of his story, he looked at the professor and asked a strange question. He asked “Do you know how to catch wild pigs?”  

The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the punch line. The young man said that it was no joke.  “You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come everyday to eat the free corn. When they are used to coming everyday, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming. When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence. They get used to that and start to eat again.  You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side.

The pigs, who are used to the free corn, start to come through the gate to eat that free corn again, you then slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd.  Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to that, that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity.  The young man then told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening to America.  The government keeps pushing us toward communism and socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned income, tax exemptions, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops, welfare, medicine, drugs, etc., while we continually lose our freedoms – just a little at a time.

One should always remember two truths:  

1.  There is no such thing as a free lunch, and   

2.  You can never hire someone to provide a service for you cheaper than you can do it yourself. 

If you see that all of this wonderful government 'help' is a problem confronting the future of democracy in America, you might want to send this on to your friends.  

However, if you think the free ride is essential to your way of life, then you will probably delete this email, but God help us all when the gate slams shut!

Quote for the day:  “The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are now outnumbered by those who vote for a living.”

For KSCO, this is Kay Zwerling.

© copyright 2013

Transcription compliments and courtesy of:  http://xcription.home.comcast.net  or  http://home.comcast.net/~xcription     I ♥ Referrals!

Kay Commentary 2013-02-02

Stream Live from our website:
Download from our website: Download this Podcast here

The following is a KSCO commentary.  Here is Kay Zwerling:

          I wrote this in June 2008, and it is in my book. 

As we think about China, and how she has so rapidly become a world presence, we may remember Napoleon’s description “Let China sleep for when she awakens, she will shake the world”.  

Today, China is not only awake, but because of her enormous population, she is – or will become – arguably the greatest force in the world.

So, despite what our sophisticated Wall Street types have to say, China is getting richer and stronger, and we are becoming weaker.  Ironically, China’s funds are so invested in America, that if she removes those possible billions and trades them into Euros, our economy may collapse.

But, the Pandora’s box is now open, and will never close.  

Why did we allow this inequity to happen?  Wouldn’t fair trade have been better than free trade?   Fair trade means that I give you 50%, and you give me 50%.

Recently, I read a most intriguing article, with regard to China, who is much more aware and aggressive than we are about acquiring the world’s dwindling raw materials.  

China is now engaged in Africa, specifically the sub-Saharan countries like Mozambique which supplies lumber, and Zambia which supplies copper.  The Congo has a wide range of minerals, and equatorial Guinea has oil.  China, at a frantic pace, is swooping up the copper, timber, natural gas, zinc, cobalt, and you name it.  

Because China can see that in the foreseeable future – factoring in the recent luxury needs of China and India, plus all of Europe, Asia, and the United States – there will be a shortage of these raw materials.  The awakened giant is now buying up everything that the poor sub-Saharan countries are willing sell her.

Evidently we are either too timid, or not looking ahead, asleep at the wheel, or maybe too obsessed with corrupt American politics.   

In fact, our Country is involved in the sub-Saharan countries, but not in the aggressive way that China is.  

We should wisely remember the forgotten work of Thomas Malthus, who said some two centuries ago “The power of population is infinitively greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for all mankind.”   In other words, there may not be enough of the raw materials to serve all mankind.  

Like China, shouldn’t we be more aggressive about obtaining the raw materials while they are still available?

For KSCO, this is Kay Zwerling.

© copyright 2013

Transcription compliments and courtesy of:  http://xcription.home.comcast.net  or  http://home.comcast.net/~xcription     I ♥ Referrals!

 

Sign Up for the Weekly Newsletter

Your mail*
Your name*


Podcasts

Advertising

Local News

2300 Portola Drive, Santa Cruz, CA